‰ Now 18 WPM transition file follows ‰ Teased again, on Wednesday, April 22 we saw sunspot 1015 fade away, just as it was about to slip over our Suns western limb. It emerged only briefly, late on April 21, and by Thursday it had disappeared. 10R7 cm solar flux, 2R8 GHz radio energy, measured in Penticton, British Columbia with a parabolic antenna that tracks the Sun, rose slightly with the sunspot appearance, to 71 and 71R1. Average solar flux for the week increased slightly over the previous week, from 69R3 to 70R2. Both planetary and mid latitude average A index declined, from 6R6 to 5R1 and 4R6 to 3R9, respectively. Sunspots have become so rare that many of us were happy to see anything at all, and of course a low geomagnetic index is welcome. One thing about this extended solar minimum, with solar wind declining and not much to upset our earths magnetosphere, it is great for 160 meters. Calvin Branch, KA1WOR of Hudson, Florida sent a link to an interesting BBC item about the extended solar minimum. You can read it on the news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature site. Some interesting observations in the article include the assertion that the twentieth century saw high solar activity, and perhaps that is now quieting down. Many of us were hoping that the activity fifty years ago during Cycle 19 was normal, and had hoped that it might return, but that doesnt seem to be the case. Too bad, because most of us get to experience only a few solar cycles. I was licensed as a Novice when I was a pre teen, so Ive seen four complete cycles, and I will probably see five. But six, or seven? One can hope. The BBC seems to do a good job of science reporting, but Im still seeing lots of confusion about what the solar cycle is actually doing. Tonight I read a blog post making fun of climatologists which claimed the current solar minimum has been ongoing for nine years now. Of course, this is nonsense. The average daily sunspot number for each year since 1999 can be found in teleprinter and packet versions of Propagation Forecast Bulletin ARLP017. Those numbers were derived by adding up each years daily sunspot data presented in this bulletin, then diving by 365, or 366 in the case of 2000, 2004 and 2008. I queried the blogger for more info on his data, but havent seen anything yet. For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL Technical Information Service web page. For a detailed explanation of the numbers used in this bulletin, see the k9la prop link off the TIS web page. An archive of past propagation bulletins is also available. Monthly propagation charts between four USA regions and twelve overseas locations are at the qst/propcharts link off the ARRL web page. Sunspot numbers were 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, and 11 with a mean of 1R6. 10R7 cm flux was 69R9, 69R8, 69R9, 70R1, 69R8, 71, and 71R1 with a mean of 70R2. Estimated planetary A indices were 6, 5, 8, 4, 4, 5 and 4 with a mean of 5R1. Estimated mid latitude A indices were 3, 4, 8, 4, 3, 3 and 2 with a mean of 3R9‚ ‰ End of 18 WPM transition file ‰