|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||
|
NEWINGTON, CT, Apr 4, 2003--California's latest attempt to pass an Amateur Radio antenna bill, Assembly Bill 1228, this week zoomed through the Assembly Committee on Local Government. The bill, introduced February 21 by Assemblyman Bob Dutton (R-63rd), got a unanimous 9-0 favorable vote at the April 2 hearing. The measure now goes to the full Assembly for a vote.
"In five minutes it was all over," said ARRL staffer and antenna expert Dean Straw, N6BV, a California resident who testified on behalf of the measure at the committee gathering. Straw pointed out that AB 1228--which is being called "The Emergency Communications Enhancement Act"--is designed to align California regulations with federal law. "AB 1228 makes it clear to municipalities what the federal law really is, while preserving local flexibility in dealing with individual Amateur Radio communication needs," Straw told the committee.
ARRL Pacific Division Director Bob Vallio, W6RGG, also spoke. ARRL Southwestern Division Director Art Goddard, W6XD, expressed his appreciation for the support of amateurs in Southern California to get the bill through its first major hurdle. "We are elated," he said. "Now on to the Assembly!"
AB 1228 would incorporate the language of PRB-1 into the statutes of California, home to some 100,000 Amateur Radio licensees--by far the greatest number of any other state and nearly 15 percent of total US licensees. The measure would require any ordinance regulating Amateur Radio antenna structures to not preclude but to "reasonably accommodate" Amateur Radio communications, to allow amateur station antenna structures "at heights and dimensions sufficient to accommodate Amateur Radio Service communications" and to constitute "the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the legitimate purpose of the city or county."
The California legislature approved a nearly identical PRB-1 measure three years ago, but Gov Gray Davis vetoed it after it reached his desk. Davis said at the time that he did so because funds for required studies were not included in his budget and because he considered amateur antennas "a local rather than a state issue." Sponsors of the current measure are planning steps to head off a second veto. The new bill--introduced at the request of the committee that worked on the 2000 legislation--does not carry a price tag, a point that Straw also made in his comments.
Straw praised Dutton's handling of the bill in committee and the work of his staff. "Assemblyman Dutton knew all the issues, and he directly answered the concerns brought up yet again by the American Planning Association (APA)," Straw said. The League of California Cities has, so far, remained neutral on the measure.
Mike Mitchell, W6RW, credited with being the "sparkplug" of the 2003 PRB-1 bill committee, said the next step is a vote on the floor of the Assembly. If that's successful, AB 1228 would move to the Senate Local Government Committee where "we will once again need witnesses." Goddard pointed out that the committee is composed of Northern and Southern California hams, since California spans two ARRL divisions.
So far, 17 states--Utah is the latest--have incorporated the essence of PRB-1 into their laws. A handful of states have approved Amateur Radio antenna legislation that includes minimum regulatory heights for antenna structures. Bills are pending in several other states with substantial Amateur Radio populations, including New York and New Jersey.
A copy of the proposed legislation is available on the California
Legislature Web site.