|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||
|
SEATTLE, WA, Jun 6, 2003--More crazy space weather this week. Average daily sunspot numbers and solar flux both were down, and the average daily A index was up. Some have expressed a lot of angst about the solar wind, solar flares, stormy conditions and resulting absorption, but VHF operators are loving it.
Average daily planetary A index compared to the previous week was up over 50 percent to 37.1. The stormiest day was Thursday, May 29, with a planetary A index of 89. Late in the day the planetary K index was 8--which is exceptional.
This week we received a number of comments and reports from fans of VHF propagation. Bob Sluder, N0IS, noted the displeasure expressed in this bulletin over high A and K index numbers. He wrote, "It is very obvious that you are not a VHF operator or you would like those numbers, because you know something is going to happen on VHF. Boy, did it happen last week. Six meters open around the clock, and the Aurora was magnificent (radiowise). Had a CW schedule with a friend on 80 meters last Thursday evening and someone had thrown the big low band switch to off, while the VHF one was set on GO."
Jon Jones, N0JK, in Kansas wrote to say that there was a big aurora display associated with coronal mass ejections on May 30. Following the breakup of the display, there was an all night E-skip opening on 6 meters from 0300-1800 UTC. He noted it was unusual to hear YV1DIG working California on 6 meters around 0600 UTC.
Al Olcott, K7ICW, wrote, "The CME events and related phenomena enhanced VHF on Thursday, 29 May, briefly here in Las Vegas. We had a rare aurora event covering a span of about 12 minutes. I had contacts with three stations, KI7BP (DN13) Idaho, KB7WW (CN85) Oregon and K7OFT (CN87) Washington in a span of two minutes on 6 meters at 2255-2257 on SSB. Beam headings here were 45 degrees azimuth. At 2302, an unidentified CW signal on 144.200 MHz showed up for about 2 minutes in a DN grid, but no ID on the weak signal. Signals from N7IJ (DN44) in Idaho persisted on 6 meters throughout our short opening here, but he didn't hear me. A simultaneous E-skip opening during this period on 2 meters from the Pacific Northwest states to California produced many interstate contacts, but it is unknown which were aurora and which were E-skip. Reports from stations in Maine said that the aurora activity was too far south for them for optimum participation. K0AWU (EN37) in Minnesota reported to me that he worked 5 stations on 222 MHz via the aurora at his northerly location. N0LL (EM09) in Kansas said he worked a 222 E skip contact in grid EM83 during the aurora, a rare event in itself!"
Ken Louks, WA8REI, wrote about an aurora experience on HF from the week before. "I worked the CQ WW WPX CW contest last weekend from a QTH 720 feet above Lake Superior in Upper Michigan. The aurora both Friday night (May 23) and Saturday night (May 24) was awesome! Shades of green, blue, deep purple . . . some almost straight overhead, and some way down at the horizon (to the north) of Lake Superior, and even reflecting into the lake. I ran QRP (5 W, Yaesu FT-817), and even in the bad conditions worked Japan, New Zealand and the Canary Islands. The aurora seemed to reflect my signal south. I worked many South America stations, but although I had a clear shot to Europe, I heard virtually nothing from Europe until Sunday afternoon."
Note that Ken had propagation to the south, but not to the north toward Europe. On HF his signals couldn't make it through a near-polar path because of the stormy geomagnetic conditions, which worsen toward the poles. Many people have thought that during geomagnetic storms, north-south transequatorial propagation is enhanced, but in reality it only seems that way because this is may be the only remaining path that still works.
Chip Margelli, K7JA, wrote May 30, "Two meters opened up between southern California and Oregon/Washington/BC last night, which obviously is unusual this far from the auroral zone, and 6 was going to some degree all night. Now, if we can just get all this storminess to subside on the 27-day rotation, FD should be in good shape! That big spot group is facing more away now, so that should help."
The month of May is over, so let's look at the daily average solar flux and sunspot numbers to spot any trends. The monthly averages of daily solar flux numbers for January through May 2003 were 144, 124.5, 133.5, 126.8 and 116.6. Daily average sunspot numbers for the same five months were 150, 87.9, 119.7, 114.3 and 89.6. To me the trend appears downward.
What about conditions in the near future? It still looks stormy, so have fun on 6 meters. We should enter a new solar wind stream over this weekend, June 7 and 8. Predicted planetary A index for June 6-12 is 15, 20, 30, 30, 25, 20 and 15. Solar flux forecast for the same days is 115, 118, 120, 120, 122 and 124. The summer solstice is this month. As we move toward "the longest day of the year," expect daytime MUF to continue to decline. While 15 meters should decline during the daytime, 20 meters should be good from North America toward the Pacific late into the evening.
Sunspot numbers for May 29 through June 4 were 98, 62, 57, 66, 61, 54 and 74, with a mean of 67.4. The 10.7 cm flux was 137.8, 117.2, 113.1, 112.3, 121.4, 114.5 and 105.6, with a mean of 117.4. Estimated planetary A indices were 89, 49, 17, 19, 39, 26 and 21, with a mean of 37.1.
Amateur solar observer Tad Cook, K7RA,
Seattle, Washington, provides this weekly report on solar conditions and
propagation. This report also is available via W1AW every Friday and an
abbreviated version also appears in The ARRL Letter. Readers
may contact the author via k7ra@arrl.net.