|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||
|
NEWINGTON, CT, Dec 4, 2003--The ARRL has asked the FCC to specifically exempt Amateur Radio antennas and support structures less than 400 feet tall from routine environmental processing relative to their impact on migratory birds. In reply comments filed December 1, the League said there is no scientific evidence that antenna structures below that height contribute significantly to migratory bird mortality. An FCC Notice of Inquiry, WT Docket 03-187, released in August seeking information on the effects of communications towers on migratory birds, drew more than 250 comments. The League told the FCC that the migratory bird issue often arises at municipal land use hearings and in the drafting of ordinances regulating antenna structures.
"At public hearings before city, town and county authorities, those who are opposed to communications antennas for aesthetic reasons typically raise issues such as migratory bird mortality as one of several arguments" against permitting antennas or limiting their placement," the ARRL comments said. "ARRL's research into the scientific literature reveals that communications towers below 400 feet are almost universally considered not to be contributors to bird mortality."
Among other studies, the ARRL cited Avian Mortality at Communication Towers: A Review of Recent Literature, Research and Methodology, a March 2000 paper prepared by Paul Kerlinger under a US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) contract. Kerlinger's review suggested that bird kills associated with communications towers "involve tall towers almost exclusively." Unpublished studies cited by Kerlinger that indicate towers lower than 400 or 500 feet are not as dangerous to migrating songbirds than towers above 500 feet.
The League said typical ham radio fixed antennas and support structures are located mostly in residential areas and range from 50 to 120 feet--although some may go as high as 200 feet. The ARRL said amateur antenna installations rarely go any higher than that because of FAA approval, painting and lighting requirements, not to mention cost and siting restrictions.
"The comments in this proceeding to date support the conclusion that communications towers less than approximately 400 feet do not contribute substantially to migratory bird kills," the ARRL said, adding that no regulatory action is justified beyond what's already in place for aviation safety.
The ARRL also pointed to FWS guidelines released in 2000 that urge communications service providers to utilize towers less than 199 feet above ground level. The FWS concedes, however, that "tower height alone may not necessarily be a critical issue that results in mortality" and that bird kills documented at tall TV towers might be due to the effects of tower lighting rather than height.
Based on the record, the League concluded,
"unlit Amateur Radio antennas cannot be considered candidates for regulation
under any circumstances."