ARRL

Secure Site Login

Forum Home - Rules - Help - Login - Forgot Password
Members can access, post and reply to the forums below. Before you do, please first read the RULES.

Understanding SWR

Jun 12th 2017, 21:14

ralphm

Joined: Jul 15th 2016, 22:48
Total Topics: 0
Total Posts: 0
For those who are constantly wondering about SWR, I invite you to read an excellent article written by K5DVW on the topic from the November 2006 issue of QST.

It was an "eye opener" for me.
Jun 16th 2017, 10:03

KE0GXB

Joined: Dec 9th 2015, 16:03
Total Topics: 0
Total Posts: 0
wow, wish I had a copy of Nov 2006 QST, my access to the arcive only goes back to 2012
Jun 16th 2017, 11:02

W1VT

Joined: Apr 4th 1998, 00:00
Total Topics: 0
Total Posts: 0
Our original archive allows the download of older articles.

http://www.arrl.org/arrl-periodicals-archive-search

Zack W1VT
ARRL Senior Lab Engineer
Aug 29th, 23:25

N9XR

Joined: May 14th 2010, 14:35
Total Topics: 0
Total Posts: 0
Were there ever any retractions or corrections made to this article? K5DVW lists Table 1 showing the 33% reflected voltage at 2:1 VSWR for example, yet lower down the article he mentions nothing of these losses. Also, if the feedline is connected directly to the transmitter without the tuner, the reflected wave will partially dissipate in the resistance of the transmitter increasing heat and adding losses to the signal being transmitter. I mean, someone needs to explain how the signal being reflected won't be dissipated by the transmitter. There seems to be a few flaws to this article. The SWR losses can be shown by using Ohm's Law. Also I have tried emailing K5DVW, but to date he has not responded.

Back to Top