Joined: Sat, Apr 7th 2012, 19:22 Roles: N/A Moderates: N/A

Latest Topics

Topic Created Posts Views Last Activity
Window line impedance Feb 4th, 16:53 1 168 on 4/2/16
CW ID necessary? May 14th 2015, 14:32 2 743 on 14/7/15
SWR and metal roof Mar 15th 2015, 23:47 6 790 on 17/3/15
Twin Lead and metal mast? Oct 31st 2014, 16:12 2 775 on 31/10/14
Dipole or loop? Aug 19th 2014, 03:02 11 2,326 on 5/9/14
dBmicrowatts? Jul 16th 2014, 19:51 3 812 on 17/7/14
Dipole crossing vertical? May 2nd 2014, 00:01 3 910 on 5/5/14
Ground Plane antenna near metal roof? Jul 6th 2013, 15:28 4 2,430 on 9/7/13
Does paint affect a Yagi? Jan 17th 2013, 02:40 4 1,379 on 25/1/13
50 or 75 ohm reference for analyzer? Jan 6th 2013, 22:52 2 1,326 on 7/1/13

Latest Posts

Topic Author Posted On
Window line impedance KO0Y on 4/2/16
I have a long non-resonant dipole fed with 300 ohm twin line. I want to construct my own feed line using 14 gauge stranded wire. I could set the distance between the conductors from one inch to three inches, using spreaders I have. Measured at the 1:1 balun, impedance of the current feed line and antenna ranges from 20 to 1200 ohms (4-10 MHz), with most points below 800 ohms. What would be the ideal distance between the conductors for the new line? Thanks for any help.

Buck ko0y
CW ID necessary? KO0Y on 14/5/15
Fldigi offers the option of CW ID, but this adds overhead to each transmission. When running an ARES directed net, we generally use MT-63 and our call signs are a part of each transmission in that mode.

My question is whether the CW ID is still required. FCC Part 97 says that ID may be made by "a RTTY emission using a specified digital code when all or part of the communications are transmitted by a RTTY or data emission."

We seldom use RTTY Baudot. Does transmission of the call sign in another data emission, such as MT-63, satisfy the ID requirements?
SWR and metal roof KO0Y on 17/3/15
Quote by WA9WVX

If you had a known good 50 Ohm Dummy Load and disconnected the RF cable from the GP-6, connected it to the 50 Ohm Dummy Load, re-measured the VSWR again and it read high, this would point the problem directly at the transmission line.


I have an oil can dummy load, and I will do that when the weather clears again. Nice yesterday, but foggy today, and I stay off the roof in bad weather; it's 35 feet from peak to ground!

In the meantime, I rigged a signal generator and got these results.

144 >10
145 >10
146 7.0
147 4.5
148 2.5
149 1.7
150 1.1
151 1.1
152 1.7
153 2.3

Resonance has shifted upwards 4 MHz. Cold moisture produce such a neat result?
SWR and metal roof KO0Y on 16/3/15
Dan, thanks. The coax is the 400MAX from DX Engineering and is about 55-60' long. It is stranded copper inside, and is rated for 2.5" permanent bends (no bends are that small). The antenna during the snowstorm was my GP-3, which I replaced two days ago with a new GP-6. I replaced the connector as the new one uses N, and there was no sign of moisture; it had been well-sealed with silicon tape inside the tubular base and the copper is shiny. At ground level, the AD lightning arrestor had been covered with snow. It was also sealed with silicone, but I have temporarily bypassed it with a new length of coax. So I am pretty sure there is no moisture in the antenna or feed line.

The roof and mast are steel; the mounting bolts are stainless, and the antenna mount is aluminum, so perhaps there is some kind of bi-metal impedance effect as you said. The coax shield is bonded to the roof through the mount, and the mast is grounded with a copper wire to the ground rod, while the coax shield is also grounded at ground level. Could there be a ground loop formed between the coax ground-level and the coax at the mast through the mast's copper wire to ground?

If either, or both of these are in play, then it seems to me I should place a plastic sleeve between the antenna mount and the mast. If, on the other hand, the roof is acting as some kind of additional ground radial (the antenna has three radials at its base), then the recourse would be to raise the antenna higher with a longer mast. This I am loath to do, as we can get high winds here.

The SWR has come down a bit more, but is still over 3.5. I guess I will wait for the rest of the snow to melt (next few days sunny in the 60s) and see if it reduces further. Do you think the plastic sleeve would be a good idea?
SWR and metal roof KO0Y on 15/3/15
I have a GP-6 2 meter/440 vertical mounted on a metal pipe that is attached to one end of a metal roof. While the SWR measures 1.1-1.5 at the antenna, it has always been higher at the radio. The feed line is LMR400. When we got a lot of snow recently, the SWR went to 8-10 or higher. I thought moisture had gotten in, but I found none when I was able to climb up there, or in any other connection. The SWR has gradually come down as the snow melts. Moreover, on mornings when the temperature has dropped below freezing, SWR is low, only to climb as the sun begins to melt the snow! Could water on the metal roof affect the antenna impedance? The base of the vertical is about five feet above the roof. Would raising it higher help? Thanks for help.

Back to Top