This page
contains a database of information about BPL systems and the BPL interference
many of them cause across the
In general,
people that are interested in learning more about the operation of these
systems should use the contact information in these database entries If there is no BPL team for a particular
system, contact the appropriate ARRL Section
Manager for more information about BPL in your ARRL Section.
ARRL
maintains a comprehensive page on BPL that has links to articles, studies,
papers and other news about BPL. See http://www.arrl.org/bpl.
The United
Power Line Council has also published a map of BPL installations.
2006
map of BPL installations
2007
map of BPL installations
The
information on this page has been compiled by ARRL from a variety of sources,
including reports received by amateurs in BPL areas its own staff work or from
articles or public presentations about BPL
It is believed by ARRL to be accurate, although it can only be as accurate
as the reports and articles used to compile it. Its accuracy cannot be
guaranteed. If anyone has corrections or
additional information, please provide that to Ed Hare, W1RFI@arrl.org, ARRL Laboratory Manager.
List of BPL Trial
by City and State
Summary Data and
Statistics About BPL Trials
Other Information about BPL Trials
AL AR AZ CA CO CT FL GA HI IA ID IL IN LA MA MD MI MN MO NC NE NY OH PA SC SD TN TX VA WA Worldwide
See also
the detailed city-by-city information that is after this table of hyperlinks to bookmarks within this web page.
|
City |
Status |
noTES |
||
|
Note: See
summary table below for description of status codes. Note: Some systems have multiple vendors in
trial, so they are listed twice. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
AVR |
Listed in
the database as active, with all reported interference to Amateur Radio
resolved. |
|||
|
AV |
Listed in the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified
that the system is in operation. |
|||
|
Al, Hoover ( |
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
||
|
A |
Listed in
the database as active. No verification of actual operation has been done. |
|||
|
SI |
This
system was in operation, but shut down. It had unresolved interference
reports or complaints that were completely resolved only when the system was
shut down. |
|||
|
P |
This
system is not active at this time and does not appear in the database, but
they are expected to implement BPL at some point. System is pending or still
under consideration. |
|||
|
CN |
Information
indicates that this system considered BPL, but it has not been implemented. |
|||
CA, Lompoc
|
CX
|
This
system considered BPL, but chose not to implement it. |
||
|
SI |
This
system was in operation, but shut down. It had unresolved interference
reports or complaints that were completely resolved only when the system was
shut down. |
|||
|
AV |
Listed in
the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified that the system
is in operation. |
|||
|
CA, San Diego - Ambient system |
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
||
|
CA, San Diego - Corinex
system |
A |
Listed in
the database as active. No verification of actual operation has been done. |
||
|
CA, San Diego - Current Technologies system |
AV |
Listed in
the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified that the system
is in operation. |
||
|
CA, San Diego - Mitsubishi system |
AV |
Listed in the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified
that the system is in operation. |
||
|
CA,
San Diego - Motorola system |
A |
Listed in
the database as active. No verification of actual operation has been done. |
||
|
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
|||
|
CT, Shelton, |
SI |
This
system was in operation, but shut down. It had unresolved interference
complaints that were completely resolved only when the system was shut down..
|
||
|
FL, Graceville ( |
SI |
This
system was in operation, but shut down. It had unresolved interference
reports or complaints that were completely resolved only when the system was
shut down. |
||
|
AV |
Listed in
the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified that the system
is in operation. |
|||
|
SP |
This
system was in operation but shut down.
Noise levels strong enough to be harmful interference to Amateur Radio
were observed, but the system was shut down before this could be fully
documented and reported. |
|||
|
SP |
This
system was in operation but shut down.
Noise levels strong enough to be harmful interference to Amateur Radio
were observed, but the system was shut down before this could be fully documented
and reported. |
|||
|
AVI |
Listed in
the database as active, with unresolved complaints of harmful interference. |
|||
|
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
|||
|
A |
Listed in
the database as active. No verification of actual operation has been done. |
|||
|
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
|||
|
HI, Honolulu – McCully (also |
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
||
|
SI |
This
system was in operation, but shut down. It had unresolved interference
reports or complaints that were completely resolved only when the system was
shut down |
|||
|
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
|||
|
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
|||
|
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
|||
|
CX |
This
system considered BPL, but chose not to implement it. |
|||
|
AVR |
Listed in
the database as active, with all reported interference to Amateur Radio
resolved |
|||
|
AVI |
Listed in
the database as active, with unresolved complaints of harmful interference. |
|||
|
PD |
This
system is not active at this time and does appear in the database, so will be
implemented relatively soon. |
|||
|
AV |
Listed in
the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified that the system
is in operation. |
|||
|
A |
Listed in
the database as active. No verification of actual operation has been done. |
|||
|
AVR |
Listed in
the database as active, with all reported interference to Amateur Radio
resolved |
|||
|
PD |
This
system is not active at this time and does appear in the database, so will be
implemented relatively soon. |
|||
|
AV |
Listed in
the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified that the system
is in operation. |
|||
|
A |
Listed in
the database as active. No verification of actual operation has been done. |
|||
|
CX |
This
system considered BPL, but chose not to implement it. |
|||
|
S |
This
system was in operation, but the BPL operator has terminated the test, or
announced that it will do so. |
|||
|
AVR |
Listed in
the database as active, with all reported interference to Amateur Radio
resolved |
|||
|
MI, Berrien CassKalamazoo Lenawee Monroe St. Joseph and
Van Buren Counties |
P |
This
system is not active at this time and does not appear in the database, but
they are expected to implement BPL at some point. System is pending or still
under consideration. |
||
|
|
P |
This
system is not active at this time and does not appear in the database, but
they are expected to implement BPL at some point. System is pending or still
under consideration. |
||
|
CN |
Information
indicates that this system considered BPL, but it has not been implemented. |
|||
|
P |
This
system is not active at this time and does not appear in the database, but
they are expected to implement BPL at some point. System is pending or still
under consideration. |
|||
|
PD |
This
system is not active at this time and does appear in the database, so will be
implemented relatively soon. |
|||
|
MN, Rochester - Current system |
H |
RPU still
interested in BPL, but is considering multiple vendors. Their BPL project is essentially on hold. |
||
|
MN, Rochester - Main.net system |
SI |
This
system was in operation, but shut down. It had unresolved interference reports
or complaints that were completely resolved only when the system was shut
down |
||
|
AVI |
Listed in
the database as active, with unresolved complaints of harmful interference. |
|||
|
AVI |
Listed in
the database as active, with unresolved complaints of harmful interference. |
|||
|
AV |
Listed in
the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified that the system
is in operation. |
|||
|
AV |
Listed in
the database as active. ARRL or local amateurs have verified that the system
is in operation. |
|||
|
SP |
This
system was in operation but shut down.
Noise levels strong enough to be harmful interference to Amateur Radio
were observed, but the system was shut down before this could be fully
documented and reported. |
|||
|
SP |
This
system was in operation but shut down.
Noise levels strong enough to be harmful interference to Amateur Radio
were observed, but the system was shut down before this could be fully
documented and reported. |
|||
|
A |
Listed in
the database as active. No verification of actual operation has been done. |
|||
|
A |
Listed in
the database as active. No verification of actual operation has been done. |
|||
|
SI |
This
system was in operation, but shut down. It had unresolved interference
reports or complaints that were completely resolved only when the system was
shut down |
|||
|
CX |
This
system considered BPL, but chose not to implement it. |
|||